International investment agreements (IIAs) aim to promote mutually beneficial investment by liberalizing and protecting foreign investments. Japan has a number of IIAs between emerging and developing economies and will introduce an agreement between developed nations after the TPP Agreement becomes effective. The fundamental aims of IIAs are non-discrimination of foreign investors and investments, protection of legitimate expectations of investors and prohibition of direct and indirect expropriation without fair compensation. Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is an effective mechanism to enforce these core substantive disciplines of IIAs and Nishimura & Asahi provides effective support to Japanese government and companies utilizing ISDS by collaborating with our network of law firms in countries advanced in investment agreement arbitration such as the U.S. and EU.
We draw on the many individual strengths across the firm and assemble the most experienced and skilled practice group to suit the particular area of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS). The team includes not only litigators with extensive experience on international arbitrations, but also lawyers involved in the drafting and negotiation of investment treaties and free trade agreements as well as those regularly and extensively handling international trade disputes, including those utilizing the WTO. The team works together closely to counsel our clients on risk management and finding solutions to issues regarding their foreign investments and their relationships with host governments.
Further, Nishimura & Asahi efficiently supports Japanese investors as well as the Japanese government in ISDS and investment treaties arbitration through our strong relationships with law firms outside of Japan, such as the U.S. and EU, where investment treaties arbitration is frequently utilized.
Article: Full enforcement of the Act regulating the use of land important from a national security perspective, the initial designation of the covered area, and its impact on foreign operators西村あさひのリーガル・アウトルック
Speaking engagement: Frontiers of International Economic Dispute Resolution: Prospects and Challenges of Arbitration and MediationSeminars
Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) - Agreement in Principle on the ECT Modernisation Negotiations, Future Developments and OutlookArticles
Article: The Frontier of International Trade Law (2) - Economic security and actions that should be takenTranscripts of lectures
Case Notes on Investment Treaty Arbitration Awards and Decisions (149) A Case in Which a Tribunal Found a Breach of FET on the Basis of Retroactive Application of Domestic LawArticles
Formulation of a New National Security Strategy, Economic Security, and CybersecurityCompetition Law / International Trade Newsletter
Update to Economic Security Promotion Act: Designation of supported materials (specified critical materials) in relation to supply chain resilienceCompetition Law / International Trade Newsletter
Reform of the Energy Charter Treaty – what is changing?Competition Law / International Trade Newsletter
Latest trends in intra-EU investor-state arbitration - a “strange animal” soon to be extinct?Dispute Resolution Newsletter
US Supreme Court prohibits 28 U.S.C. § 1782 discovery for most international arbitrationsCorporate Newsletter